| |
PS3 suffers major glitches in Japan., Hahahahaha...
Nightwing |
|

GUNS - LOTS OF GUNS
![Happy Heart Badge [*]](https://archive.mfgg.net/html/badges/happyheart.gif) ![Minigame Comp Winner Badge (1) [*]](https://archive.mfgg.net/html/badges/mcg1.gif) ![MFGG Awards 2007 Winner [*]](https://archive.mfgg.net/html/badges/award07.gif)

Group: Members
Posts: 5396
Member No.: 455
Joined: 2-June 04
Status: (0d)
![[--]](style_images/mfgg2_skin/warn_nosuspend.gif)

|
Microsoft and Sony are both losing a lot of money on their gaming divisions right now, any decision for them to stop producing video game consoles would be a decision for the better financial stability of the company. That said, Microsoft has far larger and more reliable sources of income in other areas. Sony on the other hand, is in a lot of trouble, they've lost a lot of money; and what used to be their primary in-take (games), is costing them a lot. They lose money on every PSP sold, every PS3 sold; and this is just the beginning. With their profits down so low, and the cost of launching such an expensive console during the crucial Christmas season, it is not unheard of that Sony would simply stop trying to compete in the video game market.
That said, a withdrawal like that is not very common of a Japanese business, and a concession outright isnt' as likely as a refocusing of their efforts.
Of course, contrary to a lot of internet hype about Nintendo being doomed, and Wii being a last ditch effort; Nintendo is sitting on a cash bank that's as cushy as Microsoft's. So Microsoft and Nintendo are without a doubt in this for the long haul; but if the PS3 is a full out flop, Sony might have to think about pulling the plug, sure.
As for Nintendo's online plans, while they publicly state companies can charge for games; I get the impression that there is heavy internal pressure (perhaps just from sales of games like Mario Kart DS and Animal Crossing) to keep your online games free. The connection service doesn't cost anything for the 3rd parties to use, it's only if they were running their own game servers that they'd be charging anything. Because yes, as it now stands bandwidth isn't that easy or cheap to come by; and so it's the easy way out to alienate the majority of people, sell 200,000-400,000 copies and work on keeping a diehard fanbase of subscribers in a game like Phantasy Star Universe, Final Fantasy XI, etc.
EDIT: And to throw my hat into a system hierarchy:
Wii > 360 > PS3
Wii is something new, I'm almost 22 years old and the trends in 3D games are obvious by now. In some cases companies have completely abandoned the idea of making a good 2D game based on anything because if it's a license, they figure the brand will carry itself. And if it isn't, they don't risk it because they figure it's doomed. Wii forces innovation, this control mechanism requires movement; and so much can be done with it in so many genres. Perhaps it's only because of the success of the DS, or a long time affiliation with Nintendo... but obviously developers and gamers alike believe in this console because of what it can bring that's fresh and new. As well as classic and old. It's cheaper, it's got the best line-up (both launch and looking forward), and free online game play.
The 360, I think represents what it would look like if we just kept making 'new' consoles with better hardware. It's a system made by a major American company that pulls all the support it can from every direction to get the newest and best looking games from every major franchise of the past five years. It's not forward thinking, but it is prettier, and more is possible. What makes it exciting is online infrastructure, and the possibility of using hardware power for really new experiences in games, instead of just rendering folds of the lips on individual player models. It is however, heavily hampered by Sony's presence in Japan. If the PS3 is a big hit, the 360's potential is limited because...
The PS3 and the 360 are not very different at all. They're new consoles, they have a feature list that reads akin to some sort of technological swiss army knife. They're very expensive tech toys that boast very few new games. They appeal to a mainstream consumer that wants a $7000 TV to have the best looking content pumping through it. The difference is that PS3 isn't compatible with many TVs in the same way the 360 is, it costs more, has fewer interesting games (potential failure in Japan or not Blue Dragon is a damn good reason to get a 360), and depends purely on a name brand to carry itself moving forward. With PS3 you're supposed to be getting best of both worlds: a motion sensor controller (but it's retarded, broken, PC joypad motion sensing)and a robust online experience (it's totally unproven, and thus far seems broken). There aren't any brands that follow Sony that people absolutely need; as it may stand now, a lot of Japanese companies don't know where they should place their stake... while there may be some early efforts to pull gamers to PS3, it's undeniable that developers look at the 360's sales in Japan and think "you know what, things really can get worse than they are". The PS3's time is very limited to prove that it can move systems. If it fails, within a year's time you'll see a complete momentum shift to develop for the Wii and 360 (but historically, very few Japanese that haven't been given money will flee to Microsoft).
This post has been edited by Nightwing on Nov 16 2006, 03:18 PM
--------------------

|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
Track this topic
Receive email notification when a reply has been made to this topic and you are not active on the board.
Subscribe to this forum
Receive email notification when a new topic is posted in this forum and you are not active on the board.
Download / Print this Topic
Download this topic in different formats or view a printer friendly version.
[ Script Execution time: 0.1089 ] [ 13 queries used ] [ GZIP Enabled ] [ Server Load: 1.36 ]
| |