Rush Hour 3, Movie Munchie #22| 100!!!!

I reviewed captivity somewhere which sucked balls and it wasn't just 3 short paragraphs and a bunch o pictures!

SP and Cutty have a point, MG. Your Movie Munchies need to be a whole lot longer and not include so many pictures.

Quoting because I read that review and it helped me rather than these munchies. I mean, seriously, Cutty explained what was bad about the movie and some of its good points. He also included the basic plot right to the end, which basically saved me a wasted time at the movie.

Now I think you could just improve by adding examples of what you thought was bad and what you liked best, maybe even some plotline details. Because otherwise it isn't exactly helpful.

Cutman's movie cut outs anyone?!


...anyone?

Yes please.

Your reviews are more in-depth and less pictures than the Movie Munchies, so I have to say that yours are more worthwhile to read.

Problem is I don't watch every single movie that pops out on the big screen. I do go quite often though thanks to my girlfriend being a movie junkie but i'm still not gonna watch things like rush hour 3

Except the fact that there isn't anything to write about Rush Hour 3. It's bad in pretty much bad in every degree.

I think it's funny how people are crying over the fact I gave it a 0/5. That was a joke and if it wasn't the 100th I would've probably given it a 1/5. Happy?
Seriously, if you're going to defend the movie so much why don't you go see it?

And I'll write more, I'm just really starting to get burned out from writing about every movie I see. So I'll drop the pictures from now on. Go read the first Munchie for a really short review.

This post has been edited by Mario Gamer on Aug 23 2007, 09:56 AM

There's always more to say if it's over an hour.

Well Movie Munchies were never intended to be full reviews. If someone wants to step up and fork over their money to see every movie I do, go right ahead. But I'm keeping my system how it always was.

Sorry.

Well i'm just saying they're getting shorter every time. Compare it to this one: http://archive.mfgg.net/index.php?showtopic=165132

so they're intended to be impossible to derive anything other than "it good" or "it not good" from?

That's because there's a lot to talk about there. Rush Hour doesn't have nearly as much, or anything for that matter. I don't have a history with Rush Hour. It's not one of the bigger movies of the year. It didn't have a big cliff hanger from the previous film. The previous film came out some 5 years ago. That's just a few reasons why that's longer then this.

Actually, yes. That's what they were made for, with a few details thrown in.

This post has been edited by Mario Gamer on Aug 23 2007, 10:44 AM

Well like I said I was "jus sayin'". I doubt i'll see it anyway.

Also when the flying crap is Ratatouille coming out?!

I love how everyone's complaining how short the review is when his review for Scary Movie 4 was like a sentence long.

if you seriously intend to put these on your resume as an example of talent down the line, or use them in any similar way, then... ouch, i feel for you

http://wiki.mfgg.net/index.p...h_Movie_Munchie

Come on it wasn't that bad jeez

It wasn't.