| |
Half of the human population has brain parasites
|
|
Group:
Posts:
Member No.:
Joined: --
Status: (0d)
![[--]](style_images/mfgg2_skin/warn_nosuspend.gif)

|
| QUOTE | | where science meets fiction |
Also, upon further research:
| QUOTE | The U.S. NHANES (1999-2004) national probability sample found that 10.8% of U.S. persons 6-49 years of age, and 11.0% of women 15-44 years of age, had Toxoplasma-specific IgG antibodies, indicating that they had been infected with the organism. This prevalence has significantly decreased from the NHANES III (1988-1994).
It is estimated that between 30% and 65% of all people worldwide are infected with Toxoplasmosis. However, there is large variation countries: in France, for example, around 88% of the population are carriers, probably due to a high consumption of raw and lightly cooked meat. Germany, the Netherlands and Brazil also have high prevalences of around 80%, over 80% and 67% respectively. In Britain, about 22% are carriers, and South Korea's rate is only 4.3%. |
Source. "Half of the world's population" seems to be a drastic overexaggeration of rather ambiguous 30%-65%. Also, the article is very misleading in the sense it really doesn't specify where the concentration of these infections are and why. Also from the article itself: | QUOTE | | As it turns out, science fiction writers have been thinking about whether or not parasites could alter a human being's behavior, or even take control of a person. |
When one's proof contains quotes from science fiction to speculate further outcomes, I start getting a bit skeptical.
Also, besides the author's digression to speculations concerning science fiction; he/she never really clears up what the symptoms of the disease are. I found a source that did:
| QUOTE | | Most infections in humans are asymptomatic, but at times the parasite can produce devastating disease. Infection may be congenitally or postnatally acquired. Congenital infection occurs only when a woman becomes infected during pregnancy. Congenital infections acquired during the first trimester are more severe than those acquired in the second and third trimester. While the mother rarely has symptoms of infection, she does have a temporary parasitemia. Focal lesions develop in the placenta and the fetus may become infected. At first there is generalized infection in the fetus. Later, infection is cleared from the visceral tissues and may localize in the central nervous system. A wide spectrum of clinical diseases occur in congenitally infected children. Mild disease may consist of slightly diminished vision, whereas severely diseased children may have the full tetrad of signs: retinochoroiditis, hydrocephalus, convulsions, and intracerebral calcification. Of these, hydrocephalus is the least common but most dramatic lesion of toxoplasmosis. By far the most common sequel of congenital toxoplasmosis is ocular disease. |
Source. "Most infections in humans are asymptomatic," unlike most infections in rats, in which case the organism is caused to reject it's core instinct to avoid cats (and in most cases get itself killed). In other words, most humans don't usually show negative signs of having this disease, even if a large population of the world has contracted it. And even in the people who do demonstrate negative symptoms, these symptoms are not the same as they are in rats -- they vary from species to species. Just thought I'd clear this up for the people who (like me) were skeptical of this whole ordeal at first.
|
|
|
Dark Yoshi |
|

this is the end of an epic
![Ultra Happy Heart Badge [*]](https://archive.mfgg.net/html/badges/uhappyheart.gif)

Group: Members
Posts: 4742
Member No.: 122
Joined: 2-November 03
Status: (0d)
![[--]](style_images/mfgg2_skin/warn_nosuspend.gif)

|
| QUOTE (Mrs. Aforcer @ Mar 11 2009, 07:02 AM) | 
Also, upon further research:
Source. "Half of the world's population" seems to be a drastic overexaggeration of rather ambiguous 30%-65%. Also, the article is very misleading in the sense it really doesn't specify where the concentration of these infections are and why.
Also from the article itself:
When one's proof contains quotes from science fiction to speculate further outcomes, I start getting a bit skeptical.
Also, besides the author's digression to speculations concerning science fiction; he/she never really clears up what the symptoms of the disease are. I found a source that did:
Source. "Most infections in humans are asymptomatic," unlike most infections in rats, in which case the organism is caused to reject it's core instinct to avoid cats (and in most cases get itself killed). In other words, most humans don't usually show negative signs of having this disease, even if a large population of the world has contracted it. And even in the people who do demonstrate negative symptoms, these symptoms are not the same as they are in rats -- they vary from species to species.
Just thought I'd clear this up for the people who (like me) were skeptical of this whole ordeal at first. |
you're only denying it because they want you to.
they're already in your head. taking over.
oh god they are eating you from within
--------------------
|
|
|
|
|
Group:
Posts:
Member No.:
Joined: --
Status: (0d)
![[--]](style_images/mfgg2_skin/warn_nosuspend.gif)

|
| QUOTE (Dark Yoshi @ Mar 11 2009, 11:10 AM) | you're only denying it because they want you to.
they're already in your head. taking over.
oh god they are eating you from within |
Oh.
Okay then.
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
Track this topic
Receive email notification when a reply has been made to this topic and you are not active on the board.
Subscribe to this forum
Receive email notification when a new topic is posted in this forum and you are not active on the board.
Download / Print this Topic
Download this topic in different formats or view a printer friendly version.
[ Script Execution time: 0.1019 ] [ 13 queries used ] [ GZIP Enabled ] [ Server Load: 3.21 ]
| |