3/10, lrn2troll, and what it means to YOU

You really answered your own question. We're cracking down on something, but if there's a misunderstanding, we'll accept responsibility and sort it out.

Done.

As long as your whole policy about communication is true, then I have no more binding to this case.

I would recommend, though, that you amend your first post in this thread to reflect that.

But I'm pretty sure that Kritter meant the specific phrase "lrn2troll" and its variants. To cover trolling in general, at least that is how I interpreted his post. Correct me if I'm wrong so I'm up to speed on this rule, please.

Done, i've edited the post clarifying what I mean and what we're targeting, geez I hope we've sorted this out! I haven't had my morning coffee yet and already i'm burned out.

Can we still do it in the CCC? D:

If it's a troll it has no place ANYWHERE on these boards, so no.

Well I mean like for giggles and joking in the CCC an-

pah nevermind

If you think you can find a way to use it constructively in a non-trolling manner, I say go ahead but be prepared to defend yourself. "It's a joke" probably won't cut it though.

This handsome bird is correct.

...did you guys really just argue for five pages about "the right to reply with troll rating"

Think of it as working out the finer points of an issue. It's all good now, so lets move along shall we? =}

Lock request.

Does it matter? Is there somethin' wrong or non-civilized about that?

Alright mooooove along please, don't beat a dead horse.

I'm currently petitioning moderation abilities for us lowly 1 or 2 forum mods to complete such a request in the news forum =P

Moneyman, you didn't create the topic.

Isn't that the responsibility of a Global Mod as opposed to just a forum Mod?

He is allowed to request a lock if he can provide a valid reason to support it.

And the reason is Kritter want it left alone.