READ THIS

He's known for having a reaction image collection, as well as collecting the ones other people post.



Including mine.

you brought it up and you're the one exploding this out of proportion

sure, why not.
really if you guys are going to be unfair it's not so crazy to think that the members would have a problem with something

This post has been edited by Comrade Kesha on Jul 23 2009, 04:19 PM

you asked me and then you complained about BS's decision (which I influenced of course) to ban Zash/Ryo/Draku.


Holy **** are you just being redundant to annoy me? Because IT'S REALLY working

we didn't ban them because they posted reaction images is that really so hard to get through?

If it takes it, yes, unfortunately. Look on the bright side. If you do less and less MFGGers will complain. Hopefully.

because then it's going to be never-ending and inevitably completely unnecessary

There should be one person who has their own group to themselves. "Rule Maker"

yeah, I asked you what you meant. You brought up this thing, and then I replied to it and somehow you turned it into WHY DO THE MODS ALWAYS GET QUESTIONED and here we are

are you trying to throw this off just to avoid admitting your wrong? because it's not working

that's what they posted and that's what's in the ban log, so eh, yeah it is pretty hard to understand that they were getting banned for something else

Not til I get my joking Admodinerator title.

it says reaction image spam in the CCC

yes it does

Sorry. I was wrong not to warn them beforehand, and the warnlog description is also wrong. I'll send you PM every time I ban someone with a list of specifications detailing the circumstances of the ban.


Don't take this wrongly. I'm serious.

Makes me feel bad. I just PMed Blacksquirrel with SUGGESTIONS, and I didn't mean to sound arrogant, rude, or anything of the sort.

ok, i'll be waiting

so there you go, what they were banned for is in the rules

You people are trying to exploit everything the staff do. There are almost 5000 members on MFGG, but there are only 3 admins, 4 global mods, and 4 regular mods to moderate the entire thing. It's very difficult to moderate 5000 completely different people, and generalizations are required. Even if only 200 members out of that 5000 are active regularly, it's still a chore to moderate them all with just 11 people. Stop trying to pretend like the staff are all perfect and that are acting like they are perfect, because they aren't.

If it seems bad, don't do it. Why must you require a document dictating what is good or bad? The rules are up to the staff's interpretation, and it is good enough.

Here's an idea; add this to the bottom of the rules:

Terms like "common sense" and "stupidity" are thrown around (yes, they are thrown around) like you think that if you post it enough times (or in big enough letters), everyone will suddenly "get it". That's not the case. That is the opinion and, like RetroXYZ said, interpretation of the moderation. It is very unreasonable to expect everyone to have the same, or even similar, ideas of "common sense", "stupidity" or "intelligence". Just like RetroXYZ, there are lots of different people that go here.

Yes, the job of a moderator here is not easy, but that is no excuse to go nuts with this twisted and dictatorial hunt by the staff to make a perfect (in their minds) MFGG. That's not a valid excuse at all.

TD and Techokami have admin powers too.

In my opinion it would be best if the moderators to stop permabanning members and instead give out month bans and a year ban.

PeramBanning should basically be used for extreme matters. For and example a hacker hacks the site.

All we're doing is telling you we're gonna enforce the rules a bit more now. You guys get cut retarded amounts of slack all the time.

Oh also why are we the bad guys now. Posting coolface.jpg doesn't seem like a 'good guy' thing to do.

Or if a member does many, MANY things wrong.