Sterilizing people who do more than four abortions

That goes for both males and females.

Albeit harder to prove for males eh..

This post has been edited by DJ Elly on Oct 3 2009, 09:55 AM

I think it'd be smarter to sterilize people with more than 4 kids.

Yeah, that'd make sense too.
Personally I'd think two would be the limit.

This post has been edited by DJ Elly on Oct 3 2009, 10:59 AM

please control the pet popula-*shot*

For those who don't pay attention, we're actually decreasing population in Europe and the US.

That's cool, more money for us.

we are pretty overpopulated

I realize that

Sounds like a good idea.

good

Really? That's awesome.

Only in select European countries. And the population is increased at a higher rate in 2008 than 2007. I actually read up on this kind of thing by reading international population reports, I know this subject and take it very seriously.

I'm pro sterilizing people after one child, but not for people who get too many abortions.

And since this is CCC, I am not a fan of pudding.

This post has been edited by negasquid on Oct 3 2009, 11:48 AM

I dunno, two children seems pretty fair.

And if we sterilized people after one child, the population decrease might actually be a little too drastic, if you factor in the amount of people who just straight up don't have any children at all.

even if we are trying to decrease the population, it still would be a good idea to neuter those who are all ABORTABORTABORT

Not to mention what Mrs.A said; if we stuck to one child per family; then eventually the decrease will go too far because
1+1=1 like the population my sentence structure is whack

This post has been edited by Fierce Deity Saberie on Oct 3 2009, 11:52 AM

I'm not for starilization at all.

Everyone's worried about the population, but the real problem is that people won't move out of the major cities.

And even besides that, I think people should have the freedom to have as many children as they want.

Also, the results of these sorts of things have caused strange things. China has a male to female ratio of 3 to 1. I don't think that bodes very well.

This post has been edited by MarioMK1 on Oct 3 2009, 11:55 AM

I'd rather have the freedom being able to do whatever I want, and knowing my children will be free and not slaves of poverty due to overpopulation.


This post has been edited by DJ Elly on Oct 3 2009, 11:58 AM

im all for humans doing whatever the **** they want; but do you remember that lady that asked that doctor to implant like, 15 babies in her or something? that's a bit too far.

I agree.

Overpopulation is not the cause of poverty. More people means more consumers, which means more money for corporations which means more jobs for the consumers. I suppose there could be a chance that there would not be enough employers for the consumers though, but there's such a thing as small business, and there are plenty of businesses out there. Some people just work on their own time.

In china it is very much more desirable to have a son rather than a daughter due to a male child meaning actual income for the family.
Here in the west, while we do have some discrimination, people do not have the same issue with girls as the chinese do.