| QUOTE (JetSetRaďn @ Oct 6 2009, 11:01 AM) | This is actually extremely common in contests that hold amateur work. If a participant's entry is beyond a scale of the rest to the point it wins hands down, denial of the entry is at times the best choice.
It's a silent award that the judges acknowledge, but isn't viewed during the judging.
That being said, it's only bull**** if the participant considers it bull****. It's mostly a sign the entry needs to be judged in a more advanced competition.
Again, very much a positive thing, not negative. |
There's no positive message there at ALL. They're simply telling you that you stray from the norm.
If you choose to believe you're Too Good For This Sinful Earth, it's your business and yours only.
That's mainly the reason several actually well-planned contests have different categories and different awards: Let the best work be called the best, and the best amateur work be called the best amateur work. Let the runner ups be runner ups, and the rest is just dust in the wind.
Otherwise it's just unfair, whether you go one way or the other. If you choose to judge everyone the same way, then all the amateurs would be crushed by the pros who go in for the kicks/to see if they're still good/to preserve a certain elitism (yes this happens). If you choose to disqualify a work for being too good, you might ruin the hopes for an amateur who's actually talented and doesn't have the credentials to enter a contest for pros.
--------------------
|