Powered by Invision Power Board

 
  Pages: (2) 1 [2]  ( Go to first unread post ) Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

> Is it possible
Canada
B.M.
  Posted: Oct 6 2009, 10:24 AM
Quote Post


take a wiz in da bottle: saves toilet water bro
[*]

Group Icon
Group: Members
Posts: 2428
Member No.: 3658
Joined: 19-April 07

Status: (0d) [--]


QUOTE (RelmM @ Oct 6 2009, 07:13 AM)
I love how people are concluding that the OP was an assumption.

It was from something the judge actually SAID, not from any rash conclusions. The judge even said that he/she ignored it to give others a chance. It's even stated in the OP.

you didn't state that it actually happened in the OP

i thought you were in denial!
PMEmail PosterICQ
Top
United States
MarioMK1
Posted: Oct 6 2009, 10:47 AM
Quote Post


PAY TAXES
[*][*]

Group Icon
Group: Members
Posts: 801
Member No.: 1962
Joined: 18-March 06

Status: (0d) [--]


Yeah. That's a stupid judge.

You're not supposed to be biased to anyone or against anyone, you're supposed to look at the quality of the work and judge which you believe to be the best. If you do otherwise than you're breaking the rules and thinking "I should let the others have a chance" well that chance will probably make the one that truely deserved to win not win! Congratulations, your dishonesty in the name of wussiness has given credit to people who didn't deserve it as much as someone else.

/rage

And no, this hasn't really happened to me before, but it makes me rage when it does.


--------------------
PMEmail Poster
Top
Unspecified
JetSetRaďn
Posted: Oct 6 2009, 11:01 AM
Quote Post


†GREAT DAZE GREAT DAZE GREAT DAZE GREAT DAZE GREAT DAZE BZZZZT†
[*]

Group Icon
Group: Members
Posts: 1545
Member No.: 5671
Joined: 3-September 08

Status: (0d) [--]


This is actually extremely common in contests that hold amateur work. If a participant's entry is beyond a scale of the rest to the point it wins hands down, denial of the entry is at times the best choice.

It's a silent award that the judges acknowledge, but isn't viewed during the judging.

That being said, it's only bull**** if the participant considers it bull****. It's mostly a sign the entry needs to be judged in a more advanced competition.

Again, very much a positive thing, not negative.


--------------------
PMEmail PosterAOLYahooMSN
Top
Mexico
El Huesudo II
Posted: Oct 6 2009, 11:56 AM
Quote Post


Back to my roots~
[*]

Group Icon
Group: Members
Posts: 436
Member No.: 3708
Joined: 30-April 07

Status: (0d) [--]


QUOTE (JetSetRaďn @ Oct 6 2009, 11:01 AM)
This is actually extremely common in contests that hold amateur work. If a participant's entry is beyond a scale of the rest to the point it wins hands down, denial of the entry is at times the best choice.

It's a silent award that the judges acknowledge, but isn't viewed during the judging.

That being said, it's only bull**** if the participant considers it bull****. It's mostly a sign the entry needs to be judged in a more advanced competition.

Again, very much a positive thing, not negative.

There's no positive message there at ALL. They're simply telling you that you stray from the norm.

If you choose to believe you're Too Good For This Sinful Earth, it's your business and yours only.

That's mainly the reason several actually well-planned contests have different categories and different awards: Let the best work be called the best, and the best amateur work be called the best amateur work. Let the runner ups be runner ups, and the rest is just dust in the wind.

Otherwise it's just unfair, whether you go one way or the other. If you choose to judge everyone the same way, then all the amateurs would be crushed by the pros who go in for the kicks/to see if they're still good/to preserve a certain elitism (yes this happens). If you choose to disqualify a work for being too good, you might ruin the hopes for an amateur who's actually talented and doesn't have the credentials to enter a contest for pros.


--------------------

user posted image user posted image user posted image user posted image user posted image
PMEmail Poster
Top
Mexico
seldeslim
Posted: Oct 6 2009, 12:03 PM
Quote Post


so good that its banned
[*][*][*][*][*]
[*]

Group Icon
Group: Members
Posts: 4186
Member No.: 2016
Joined: 15-April 06

Status: (0d) [--]


only if you got all the badges


--------------------
Tribute 1 BROWN mexican with forty years or less of AGE. Check all people your opponent controls, your opponent's hand, and all cards they draw (until the end of your opponent's third turn after this card's activation), and destroy all people with five or more years of AGE.

also this is gato from new mfgg3
just in case you're wondering about my join date status you silly newbies
PMUsers WebsiteAOL
Top
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

  Topic Options Topic Options Pages: (2) 1 [2]  Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

 




[ Script Execution time: 0.0580 ]   [ 14 queries used ]   [ GZIP Enabled ]   [ Server Load: 0.71 ]