MFGG Message Boards: Archives -> Pip's Pokemon Posting

Mario Fan Games Galaxy · Forum Rules 6.0 - Read before posting

Help

Members

Calendar

Chat

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Resend Validation Email

MFGG Message Boards: Archives -> The Dungeon -> Casual Conversation Castle

Rules for Casual Conversation Castle

Pages: (2) 1 [2] ( Go to first unread post )

Pip's Pokemon Posting, MAYBE A REWARD INSIDE

Track this topic | Email this topic | Print this topic

Miaxis

Posted: Oct 7 2009, 07:13 AM

hagan bromas
[*]

Group: Members
Posts: 1799
Member No.: 2793
Joined: 12-October 06

Status: (0d) [--]

QUOTE

#533: Scaremitar- ghost/steel haunted sword
#534: Dephantse- ghost/steel haunted shield

533- Attack lower than defense
534- Defense lower than attack

aren't swords offensive and shields defensive or is this an intentional negation and I completely missed the point

--------------------

Baroque

Posted: Oct 7 2009, 07:19 AM

Group: Members
Posts: 817
Member No.: 6076
Joined: 11-March 09

Status: (0d) [--]

QUOTE (Miaxis @ Oct 7 2009, 04:13 AM)

aren't swords offensive and shields defensive or is this an intentional negation and I completely missed the point

to be honest i was wondering myself so it's not just you

--------------------

(DA needs update) |

Clean FA | Why I Cut Quotes
You see things, and you ask, 'Why?' But I dream things that never were, and I ask, 'Why not?'

QUOTE (Ryo)

its the correct form of to.........lemme run it down for ya

to is used when your talking about the number. good way to remember this: to has to letters

too is used when your talkin about actions in stuff.

two is used when your talking about places and locations

Pip

Posted: Oct 7 2009, 05:56 PM

you are now reading my posts in chris tucker's voice
[*]

Group: Members
Posts: 5151
Member No.: 2941
Joined: 13-November 06

Status: (0d) [--]

QUOTE (Miaxis @ Oct 7 2009, 07:13 AM)

aren't swords offensive and shields defensive or is this an intentional negation and I completely missed the point

it's intentional

Armor has more defense than a sword, but more attack than a shield

also bump

--------------------

**** are p. cool

Baroque

Posted: Oct 7 2009, 05:59 PM

Group: Members
Posts: 817
Member No.: 6076
Joined: 11-March 09

Status: (0d) [--]

QUOTE (Pip @ Oct 7 2009, 02:56 PM)

it's intentional

Armor has more defense than a sword, but more attack than a shield

also bump

you're not making any sense, please word this better

it says

533- attack lower than defense

that means 533's attack is lower than 533's defense

which would make no sense; so can you please edit these lines to clarify

--------------------

(DA needs update) |

Clean FA | Why I Cut Quotes
You see things, and you ask, 'Why?' But I dream things that never were, and I ask, 'Why not?'

QUOTE (Ryo)

The IT	Posted: Oct 7 2009, 06:03 PM
Pow right in the kisser! Group: Members Posts: 549 Member No.: 4423 Joined: 11-September 07 Status: (0d)	You know a good pokemon duo type would be a psychic/dark pokemon, and it's only weakness is a bug type move. Pretty neat type of pokemon huh? -------------------- My Super Smash Bros. Brawl Friend code: 4468-1112-9557 PM me whenever you want to brawl me. Human Reference: Pokemon Platnium Friend Code: 5327 7854 4252

Pip

Posted: Oct 7 2009, 06:04 PM

you are now reading my posts in chris tucker's voice
[*]

Group: Members
Posts: 5151
Member No.: 2941
Joined: 13-November 06

Status: (0d) [--]

QUOTE (Baroque @ Oct 7 2009, 05:59 PM)

it evolves at a certain level when its attack is lower than its defense

like tyrogue

--------------------

**** are p. cool

MegaMan	Posted: Oct 7 2009, 06:05 PM
There appears to be no slumber for the malevolent. Group: Members Posts: 41541 Member No.: 41 Joined: 13-October 03 Status: (0d)	Fire/Grass would be an awesome type. --------------------

Pip

Posted: Oct 7 2009, 06:06 PM

you are now reading my posts in chris tucker's voice
[*]

Group: Members
Posts: 5151
Member No.: 2941
Joined: 13-November 06

Status: (0d) [--]

QUOTE (MegaMan @ Oct 7 2009, 06:05 PM)

Fire/Grass would be an awesome type.

user posted image

that is an amazing idea

also i was already planning for a psychic/dark

--------------------

**** are p. cool

The IT

Posted: Oct 7 2009, 06:06 PM

Pow right in the kisser!
[*]

Group: Members
Posts: 549
Member No.: 4423
Joined: 11-September 07

Status: (0d) [--]

QUOTE (MegaMan @ Oct 7 2009, 07:05 PM)

Fire/Grass would be an awesome type.

user posted image

Think the same thing of the pumpkin type pokemon, but I was thinking of a grass/ghost type of a pumpkin pokemon.

--------------------

My Super Smash Bros. Brawl Friend code:
4468-1112-9557
PM me whenever you want to brawl me.
user posted image

Human Reference:

Pokemon Platnium Friend Code: 5327 7854 4252

Lupo

Posted: Oct 7 2009, 06:06 PM

Unlimited Plant Works

Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 1296
Member No.: 6214
Joined: 29-April 09

Status: (0d) [--]

QUOTE (Baroque @ Oct 7 2009, 06:59 AM)

and offensively, they're practically useless

sup

CrashMan

Posted: Oct 7 2009, 06:08 PM

monarchs are kings
[*]

Group: Members
Posts: 9302
Member No.: 1899
Joined: 22-February 06

Status: (0d) [--]

QUOTE (Baroque @ Oct 7 2009, 05:59 AM)

weak to fire and fighting. common much?

and offensively, they're practically useless

oh my god fire types are so common oh wait no they aren't

fighting types aren't THAT common either save for heracross and lucario.

steel was made to be a defensive type in the first place anyways. metagross is the only offensive steel and meteor mash is good enough to make him with a choice band kickass.

edit: how the **** did i forget scizor.

This post has been edited by CrashMan on Oct 7 2009, 06:09 PM

--------------------

MegaMan	Posted: Oct 7 2009, 06:09 PM
There appears to be no slumber for the malevolent. Group: Members Posts: 41541 Member No.: 41 Joined: 13-October 03 Status: (0d)	Draco probably meant how common fighting and fire-type moves are (and fire isn't really that common) But steel is still an awesome type to have if you're not rock or ice (which doesn't exist yet) Bug/Steel has like two weaknesses Psychic/Steel has two, and two of the three Pokemon with this typing have ways to get around one of the two Steel/Flying used to be the best typing around since it wasn't weak to any physical attack This post has been edited by MegaMan on Oct 7 2009, 06:12 PM --------------------

Lupo

Posted: Oct 7 2009, 06:10 PM

Unlimited Plant Works

Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 1296
Member No.: 6214
Joined: 29-April 09

Status: (0d) [--]

QUOTE (CrashMan @ Oct 7 2009, 07:08 PM)

metagross is the only offensive steel

and of course my previous post

CrashMan

Posted: Oct 7 2009, 06:12 PM

monarchs are kings
[*]

Group: Members
Posts: 9302
Member No.: 1899
Joined: 22-February 06

Status: (0d) [--]

QUOTE (Lupo @ Oct 7 2009, 06:10 PM)

and of course my previous post

i said i forgot scizor and empoleon isn't exactly the most offensive thing ever

--------------------

Pip	Posted: Oct 8 2009, 01:54 PM
you are now reading my posts in chris tucker's voice Group: Members Posts: 5151 Member No.: 2941 Joined: 13-November 06 Status: (0d)	Proposed type changes: Gyarados- Water/Dragon Charizard- Fire/Dragon Ninetales- Fire/Ghost -------------------- **** are p. cool

1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)

0 Members:

« Next Oldest | Casual Conversation Castle | Next Newest »

Topic Options Pages: (2) 1 [2]

[ Script Execution time: 0.0764 ] [ 13 queries used ] [ GZIP Enabled ] [ Server Load: 0.80 ]