Well, Well

Because Retriever II stopped replying on AIM, I have an inquiry about my warning. You see, apparently I've been warned for trolling. Reasoning given when asked about it was "general assishness and being critical". First off, that last part should not be warnable because it was a-ok to criticise me when I was a moderator. Now all of the sudden opinions can not be spoken? Hmm... but anyway:

My main question is why I am the only one warned for being assish when most of my assish replies were in response to assish comments from other members? BlazeShad being a prime example.

Still assish comments, you could have taken it in stride, ignored it, replied in a way that wasn't being a prick, etc.

*smacks forhead*

EDIT: MY OWN FORHEAD

This post has been edited by Duckboy on Jul 26 2005, 12:20 AM

It's not fair that they got away without a warning. That's my point. If you're going to warn one, warn all.

Unreasonably critical. It's one thing to complain, and another to complain at every little oppurtunity, which is the same thing Kritter did when he was an ex-mod. Except in his case, he was provoking us as a .. what should I call it .. training exercise?

Your warn was by no means restricted to a single event.

Will you kindly provide examples on AIM because I have no idea how I was unreasonably critical? And even if I was, I wasn't flaming you all about it.

This post has been edited by Nintendwarf on Jul 26 2005, 12:25 AM

You sometimes ruin topics with responses consisting of "your mom". But I said SOMETIMES. You're scary, so I'm not going to read this topic again.

...That would be joking and in the PGZ. And everybody does it. What the hell?

Please read the sticky.

I don't.

This post has been edited by MikeL on Jul 26 2005, 12:28 AM

Don't trust Jet btw

^

Okay, you know what SP? There is not a single warn I could hand out without someone saying "Well how come x wasn't warned for y and why wasn't z warned for q", especially when it's not a warn for a very specific incident.

It wasn't my decision alone, and it's a trend we've been seeing for a while now. And severla people including BlazeShad have allready had their version of a cumulative warn while you've been getting off scot-free in every incident you've been involved in. If you want exmaples just browse through some of your past topics, especially the locked ones.

If you're going to keep arguing the "but what about so and so", I might as well disband the entire warning system and either let the forum degenerate to the point of a bubbling quagmire of filth, or ban everyone. We're not gods.

Don't make the same mistake I made. *****ing over a warn. Take it and don't whine about it.

Lock this topic.

I have nothing further to say except that the assish comments were mostly in reply to other assish comments.

Good day.

Once again right back to me, I don't know if you are blind or retarded? Look at my warning percent, IT WAS 33% BEFORE, NOW IT IS 67%, SOMETHING MUST'VE HAPPENED! But don't worry, I'll go get your bottle.

RII was right. I read some locked topics, and your posts in it were not in response to other ass comments.

No point to this topic