MFGG Message Boards: Archives -> Cave of Flames

Mario Fan Games Galaxy · Forum Rules 6.0 - Read before posting

Help

Members

Calendar

Chat

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Resend Validation Email

MFGG Message Boards: Archives -> General -> General Chat

Pages: (2) 1 [2] ( Go to first unread post )

Cave of Flames, Should we bring it back?

Track this topic | Email this topic | Print this topic

SonicProject

Posted on Aug 22 2005, 06:53 PM

Finkrats that I spit on know not of the cool I have.
[*]

Group: Members
Posts: 54900
Member No.: 56
Joined: 14-October 03

Status: (0d) [--]

QUOTE (Spottswoode @ Aug 22 2005, 05:51 PM)

I've read it when it was up, so I could catch up on stuff that I've missed, so I didn't make the same mistake. It's also very fun to me seeing people argue.

You not equal everybody.

And as for the example thing, people continue behaving badly even after being warned. You think the CoF is going to do anything to change that?

--------------------

Apologies for the nostalgia.

Weirdestchild

Posted on Aug 22 2005, 06:58 PM

I'm HaxXoring your brain.
[*]

Group: Members
Posts: -1295
Member No.: 50
Joined: 13-October 03

Status: (0d) [--]

QUOTE (Nintendwarf @ Aug 22 2005, 11:53 PM)

You not equal everybody.

And as for the example thing, people continue behaving badly even after being warned. You think the CoF is going to do anything to change that?

You said give an example, so I gave an example through my own memory of that place.

--------------------

I can still edit my signature.

Yup, as it is now the 30th day of May in the year of 2010.

SonicProject

Posted on Aug 22 2005, 07:01 PM

Finkrats that I spit on know not of the cool I have.
[*]

Group: Members
Posts: 54900
Member No.: 56
Joined: 14-October 03

Status: (0d) [--]

QUOTE (Spottswoode @ Aug 22 2005, 05:58 PM)

You said give an example, so I gave an example through my own memory of that place.

I didn't say anything about giving me an example. Maybe you should have read the rest of that post.

--------------------

Apologies for the nostalgia.

Retriever II	Posted on Aug 22 2005, 07:01 PM
Catalyst Group: Members Posts: 18290 Member No.: 52 Joined: 13-October 03 Status: (0d)	I'm neutral on the issue. It's got its ups and downs. To be made viewable again, it would of course need very thourough cleaning. --------------------

Xgoff

Posted on Aug 22 2005, 07:02 PM

<):|

Group: Members
Posts: 52341
Member No.: 24
Joined: 13-October 03

Status: (0d) [--]

QUOTE (Retriever II @ Aug 22 2005, 06:01 PM)

I'm neutral on the issue. It's got its ups and downs. To be made viewable again, it would of course need very thourough cleaning.

Or just a completely new one.

--------------------

This post may contain original research or unverified claims.
Please disregard the above information and contact an administrator.

DISCLAIMER: by sending me (xgoff) a private message, you agree to the directives and their terms specified henceforth:
DIRECTIVE 1 (APPLE): i may or may not reply promptly or at all; and there are no guarantees to the usefulness of the reply. i may not acknowledge whether i have even received your private message
DIRECTIVE 2 (CHILE CON CARNE): as per my view, "private" applies only to the initial transaction, and the material of your message may or may not be made public at my discretion; as this will more than likely be a post in the CCC or IRC, you may not be able to view it
DIRECTIVE 3 (FEATHER DUSTER): you must address me (xgoff) as "Sir Master Xgofficus his Highest and Most Awesome the Third"; failure to comply with this term may invoke one or both of the above directives, and i will leave a burning bag of **** on your doorstep
DIRECTIVE 4 (BOOTSTRAP): if you have read this disclaimer, please private message me promptly, in compliance with the above terms, so i can ensure you are capable of following directions you idiot
this concludes the test of the emergency disclaimer system, your scheduled programming will now continue. satisfaction guaranteed, and 100% cash back available under certain circumstances; restrictions may or may not apply within your place of residence
NOTICE: these directives and their terms may change at any time, without notice; as a private message transaction to myself assumes an understanding and full compliance of the above, you should ensure you are fully aware of the above terms at any point before sending a private message; any message received is assumed to have been sent in compliance with the above

QUOTE

(5:25:58 PM) Mikau: xgoff
(5:26:00 PM) Mikau: guess what
(5:26:04 PM) Xgoff: chicken butt
(5:26:09 PM) Mikau: **** you

SonicProject	Posted on Aug 22 2005, 07:04 PM
Finkrats that I spit on know not of the cool I have. Group: Members Posts: 54900 Member No.: 56 Joined: 14-October 03 Status: (0d)	If you do it, I would suggest removing names out of posts like "soandso is a f**". It's obvious that you can't change who they reply to though. -------------------- Apologies for the nostalgia.

Duckboy

Posted on Aug 22 2005, 07:30 PM

Colonel... What is this duck thing?
[*]

Group: Banned
Posts: 38524
Member No.: 197
Joined: 29-December 03

Status: (71582609m) [XX]

QUOTE (Retriever II @ Aug 22 2005, 08:01 PM)

I'm neutral on the issue. It's got its ups and downs. To be made viewable again, it would of course need very thourough cleaning.

If you do that, don't even bother making it viewable at all. That kinda defeats the purpose of seeing the cave of flames anyway.

Klobber

Posted on Aug 22 2005, 07:32 PM

hands off the yo-yo
[*]

Group: Members
Posts: 26140
Member No.: 61
Joined: 14-October 03

Status: (0d) [--]

QUOTE (Duckboy @ Aug 22 2005, 07:30 PM)

If you do that, don't even bother making it viewable at all. That kinda defeats the purpose of seeing the cave of flames anyway.

He's talking about the completely illegible topics I think. Not to mention the other day I went in there and randomly attached an image to a post because I was too lazy to use the Penguinia FTP.

Duckboy

Posted on Aug 22 2005, 07:38 PM

Colonel... What is this duck thing?
[*]

Group: Banned
Posts: 38524
Member No.: 197
Joined: 29-December 03

Status: (71582609m) [XX]

QUOTE (Klobber @ Aug 22 2005, 08:32 PM)

He's talking about the completely illegible topics I think. Not to mention the other day I went in there and randomly attached an image to a post because I was too lazy to use the Penguinia FTP.

oh :P

EDIT: actually, those topics might be funny to read too XD

This post has been edited by Duckboy on Aug 22 2005, 07:38 PM

Trasher	Posted on Aug 22 2005, 11:22 PM
Group: Members Posts: 8105 Member No.: 54 Joined: 14-October 03 Status: (0d)	Yeah, I vote against it. If people want to know why a thread mysteriously got "deleted" (put in the COF), they can PM a staff member and they can look it up. Just making all the grudged, flames, etc. public would not be wise.

jas

Posted on Aug 23 2005, 03:55 AM

hack

Group: Members
Posts: 10850
Member No.: 580
Joined: 28-August 04

Status: (0d) [--]

QUOTE (Lady Fiora @ Aug 23 2005, 09:53 AM)

I see it as a pointless forum to be honest, and its just something to get in the way.

How would you know?

You haven't seen it :\

EDIT: It should be brought back. It shows actual examples of what is warnable. And what to avoid.

This post has been edited by jas on Aug 23 2005, 03:56 AM

Darkzy	Posted on Aug 23 2005, 03:58 AM
Shut up and drive Group: Members Posts: 10216 Member No.: 875 Joined: 7-March 05 Status: (0d)	its not a good idea, its a bad reminder of people being ganged up on, flaming and stupid stupid stupid things. So no. -------------------- Waste of my Time Shaw Yay (6:13:43 AM): But few know of it~ Shaw Yay (6:13:51 AM): Of Shaw's "disease" Darkzypurple (6:14:13 AM): I told you not to sleep with that pink bunny

Draco Icebane	Posted on Aug 23 2005, 06:32 AM
Standard Member Group: Banned Posts: 52997 Member No.: 10 Joined: 13-October 03 Status: (71582612m)	Is it just me or has the removal of CoF from public viewing caused flamewars to become less frequent

1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)

0 Members:

« Next Oldest | General Chat | Next Newest »

Topic Options Pages: (2) 1 [2]

[ Script Execution time: 0.0921 ] [ 15 queries used ] [ GZIP Enabled ] [ Server Load: 0.39 ]