| |
IGN reviews New Super Mario Bros., 9.5/10
DistantJ |
|

Standard Member
![Happy Heart Badge [*]](https://archive.mfgg.net/html/badges/happyheart.gif)

Group: Members
Posts: 2616
Member No.: 850
Joined: 26-February 05
Status: (0d)
![[--]](style_images/mfgg2_skin/warn_nosuspend.gif)

|
| QUOTE (RageMario @ May 8 2006, 04:29 PM) | *9.4
The port got a much lower score, as well as the SA1 port. |
Three reasons.
1. The Sonic Adventure games were mindblowing for their time, but at the time of their ports they had been surpassed.
2. The critic chosen to review for Dreamcast was a Sega based critic, who was a Sonic fan, the critic now chosen to review Sonic titles is a Nintendo based critic who I believe has a slight bit of bias left in his blood against Nintendo's former 'nemesis'.
3. They showed off the Dreamcast's hardware big time, but the GC was capable of far more.
Frankly I think that Shadow the Hedgehog would have gotten at least a 7 if it was the old Sega critic reviewing it.
Although I know this Mario will be fantastic, even if it had quite a lot of flaws, I'd still expect this kind of rating, because it's Mario. Just how even if Twilight Princess has some terrible crippling flaws, I still know it'll get at least 9.6.
--------------------
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
Track this topic
Receive email notification when a reply has been made to this topic and you are not active on the board.
Subscribe to this forum
Receive email notification when a new topic is posted in this forum and you are not active on the board.
Download / Print this Topic
Download this topic in different formats or view a printer friendly version.
[ Script Execution time: 0.1339 ] [ 14 queries used ] [ GZIP Enabled ] [ Server Load: 1.37 ]
| |